News, opinion and good humor
about
the Mar Vista, Westdale and North Westdale neighborhoods
of Los Angeles, California

The Westmar Sun
(You have to have trust . . .)
 

Excerpts from election coverage of 2005
Statements of 2005 candidates
as furnished by the Mar Vista Community Council
  KEN ALPERN
My qualifications to be re-elected to the Mar Vista Community Council (MVCC) are based on my efforts over the last several years:

1)      Transportation efforts to improve traffic and promote mass transit have been the  main thrust of my community efforts.  I have written several prominent MVCC motions supporting the Exposition and Green Light Rail Lines, as well as motions regarding traffic/urban planning efforts surrounding LAX reconfiguration, Playa Vista and Santa Monica College.  Having been both inclusive and representative of every MVCC stakeholder who wanted to play a role in these motions, I have invigorated the credibility and effectiveness of the MVCC to local neighborhoods.

2)      I have a strong record of outreach efforts promoting the MVCC to both residential and business communities dating back to before the MVCC was certified.  Furthermore, I chaired the Outreach Committee during the Spring and Summer of 2004, as the Board transitioned to include Zone Directors.

3)      I continue to improve the working relationship between the City and the MVCC, by working with the offices of both CD11 and CD5 Councilmembers--and in so doing have helped enhanced the effectiveness of the MVCC’s community efforts.

4)      I play an important role in representing Westside Village (the neighborhood in which I reside) within the MVCC, and still continue to work with neighborhoods within and adjacent to the MVCC.

5)      I have promoted the business environment within the MVCC, and wrote the MVCC motion supporting the Greuel-Garcetti Business Tax Reform Measure passed by the L.A. City Council.  I have also supported the MVCC Commercial Corridors Initiative that has been the hallmark of our Urban Planning Committee’s efforts to improve the future of the Mar Vista region.

My Vision for the Mar Vista Community Council (MVCC) is that it should be:

1)      A representative entity that can articulate and represent the values and priorities of the Mar Vista Community (from Walgrove to Mar Vista to Westside Village), with a Board that passes timely and well-written motions and policies to represent the entire region.

2)      A liaison between the City of Los Angeles to the L.A. City Council (in particular, Council Districts 11 and 5) that establishes the MVCC as a critical entity which requires inclusion in all major land use, transportation and environmental decisions within the region.  The Board should appoint representatives to the major City Committees and Departments, regardless of whether they are Board members, who should be empowered to represent the MVCC.

3)      A forum for public dialogue and debate that encourages businesses, developers and residents to promote their ideas and improve the region’s shortcomings while maintaining the region’s strengths.  The MVCC Land Use/Urban Planning and Transportation/Infrastructure Committees have proven extremely successful in representing the region in major issues such as Playa Vista, LAX and SMC Bundy Campus—and this representation should be continued and even expanded.

4)      A “thinktank” recognized by the region’s federal, state, county and city politicians as representative of Westside innovation and thought-leadership.  The MVCC has become a “go-to” organization for politicians to gather public input, and this image should be maintained.

5)      A source of information for residents to learn about important projects and events within the region and the City, and a good starting point to create Neighborhood Watch groups and Historical Societies to promote local quality of life.

6)      An organization that continues to promote Education, Business Development, the Arts, and Culture to establish the Mar Vista Community as an excellent place to live and to work.
Questions for incumbent Directors
For Ken Alpern
His responses were received on Tuesday, March 8, 2005

1. How would you bring underrepresented people into the work of the Community Council — specifically, apartment dwellers, low-income people, Latinos and other “minorities” and business owners/employees? Or do you consider this an issue at all? (More information here.)

Alpern response: I chaired the Outreach Committee for several months during a transition period between the Boards of my first and second years.

During that time, I helped see to it that an appropriate amount was allotted for quarterly newsletters to all stakeholders — including renters and business owners — and with newsletters printed in Spanish as well as English.  I have walked to most of the apartment complexes from Sepulveda to Overland, from National to Charnock, and I can assure you that getting access to all of our Stakeholders is a top priority to me. 
 
Sadly, it's proved extremely difficult to get renters and business owners/employees to participate in community events, even when aggressive outreach is performed.  I will always be open to new ways to reach all outgoing Stakeholders, regardless of where they live and of what socioeconomic group to which they belong.

2. Have you attended any meetings of the Congress of Neighborhoods or any training sessions sponsored by the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment?

Alpern response: I have attended training sessions sponsored by DONE [the Los Angeles Department of Neighborhood Empowerment], although my six-day work week does not allow me to attend the DONE and BONC [Board of Neighborhood Commissioners] meetings I would have otherwise liked to attend.

At this time, I support the efforts of the Congress of Neighborhoods but do not have enough time to be active while I place so many efforts towards regional transportation projects like freeway widening, getting the Green Line to connect to and through LAX to the Westside, and getting the Expo [light-rail] Line to the Westside.

3. In the 2003 election you stated you were a proponent of Neighborhood Watch, yet you have never attended a meeting of the Palms-Westside Village Neighborhood Watch, which serves your own neighborhood. Why is that?

Alpern response: An excellent question. Virtually every meeting of that Neighborhood Watch coincided with my other transportation-related meetings.

With LAX reconfiguration and Playa Vista, over the past two years I have poured an exhaustive amount of time and energy into building the concept of re-establishing the previously environmentally cleared Coastal Green Line Extension that extends beyond LAX via Aviation Blvd. and up Lincoln Blvd., past Playa Vista, to the future Expo Line in Santa Monica.

I have worked with many folks from Westchester, Venice and other Westsiders, and I can honestly say that Westside access to LAX and the Green Line is now on the radar screen.  The Expo Line is also No. 1 in the list of new MTA [Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority] projects to pursue if funding becomes available.
 
Where did that leave me with time for Neighborhood Watch?  Not with much!  I did enjoy hearing about them in the monthly summaries at the WVCA Board meetings — although the poor Neighborhood Watch attendance (by the entire region) bothers me.

Whether it's a busy schedule, worsening gridlock or just apathy that sucks the energy out of a person to prevent good attendance for evening meetings, it's not a good thing.

4. You claim to be a friend of rapid transit. How often do you take a bus and when was the last time? What would you do to improve the lot of the average bus rider?

Alpern response: Careful about asking me about rapid transit — you might find I can't stop talking about it! 

I am NOT your average rapid-transit advocate; I am a transportation advocate who is as bullish about freeway improvement projects as I am about rapid transit.  It's just that we unfortunately lack room for new freeways except in a few key places (like the 101/405 interchange), so mass transit will have to be considered in the long-term for this next century.
 
As to your question, mass transit is lousy for the Westside — it is NOT "rapid" transit, and it needs a great deal of improvement.

I do not take the bus because no bus takes me to where I need for my work, and if they did it would take hours to get to Orange and Riverside counties to my clinics.  I would never ask anyone to take something that I would/could never do, but I would like to change this over the next 10-20 years. 
 
I am convinced that with more Metro Rapid Bus service, new Westside rail lines and better operations (many, many ideas behind that phrase), more Westsiders could abandon their car for true "rapid" transit.  All three Council District 11 candidates have spoken to me at length about what we want for the future, and I will remain in touch with whoever wins that race — and the mayoral race, as well.

5. You state in your qualification statement, above, that you "play an important role in representing Westside Village." How can that be when Westside Village is 75% renters and you have for many years been a Board member of a "Civic Assn." (for Westside Village) that does not allow apartment dwellers to be members?

Alpern response: A superb question — see above for my outreach efforts to all local residents.

It is very difficult to get into the differences between homeowner and renter priorities — but they exist, and Westside Village Civic Assn. is one of many homeowner organizations that retain exclusive membership to homeowners.

I am a homeowner, and cannot ignore my own personal preferences — but I am proud of the efforts of our previous and current WVCA presidents to begin the discussion on how to work with and include our renting neighbors.
 
Unfortunately, George, your longstanding anger at not being included for membership in a homeowners association has led to many unfair and downright untrue articles in The Sun that inaccurately portray the facts about the WVCA's activities.  Bashing the WVCA over the head is hardly a way to get them to warm up to you, and making them feel threatened is not the best way to make friends with an organization that has, like it or not, performed the lion's share of civic activities and community representation for years.

In fact, the WVCA helped establish the aforementioned Palms/Westside Village Neighborhood Watch.

6. In your 2003 campaign statement you favored "better schools" and would "encourage parental/community participation." Exactly how did you do this during the past two years?

Alpern response: I can honestly say that my work and community schedule did not allow me to play a role in MVCC Board Member Amy Lawrence's Education Committee.  I am very proud of her efforts, but I had to draw the line somewhere — or quit my job or lose my family.  Again, I am so proud of Amy's efforts, but I do admit that this is one of my greatest disappointments over the past two years.
 
I did help establish a MVCC kiosk at the [Mar Vista branch] library, but found I could not pursue more library efforts because of the library's own limited schedule and my own busy work/community schedule.

7. In August 2004, you wrote that "apartment dwellers within the confines of the MVCC will need better representation to help homeowners gain better insight to the needs and interests of all MVCC constituents." What concrete steps have you taken to bring this about? Source here.

Alpern response: I've mentioned my outreach efforts above, and will always favor new ways to get access to those renters — many of whom exist behind locked doors to gated complexes.  What I cannot do is make them be active when they have no wish to do so. 

Virtually all of the neighborhood councils have found it more difficult to find large numbers of energetic, outgoing renters to play a role in their community.  If there was a "key" to having landlords and renters' groups open access to their tenants, I'd love to find it.

This problem remains endemic throughout the city, and if anyone has any new ideas I'm open to 'em.

8. How can you justify your favorable MVCC vote to allocate $1,000 to the restrictive Westside Village Civic Assn. of which you are a director? (Source here.) Are you aware that the MVCC bylaws state that "The Council and its participants shall avoid conflicts of interest.  In situations in which a conflict of interest exists, the involved Director shall report the conflict to the Board and not participate in the decision-making process on that issue."

Alpern response: That was one of the MVCC's most important outreach efforts over the past two years, and your representation in The Sun has been not only unfair but potentially slanderous.

The plan was a joint outreach effort by the MVCC and the WVCA for Zone 1, and I will absolutely support a similar effort — especially for the new Zone 5 homeowners association, or for any combined effort for a single zone.
 
Please be aware, George, that the WVCA not only donated several thousand dollars (and a superhuman amount of time and energy) to the Westside Village Festival and the Bike Rodeo, but footed the $1000 MVCC bill for both events for six months while we waited for reimbursement from the city.
 
A great deal of time was spent by both then-Board Member Bobby Holliday and Treasurer Tony Navarro exploring how to make this donation legal and ethical according to city standards.

It's important to emphasize that the WVCA subsidized the Westside Village Festival that, for a nominal $10 anyone from the community, enjoyed pony rides, food, bouncer rides, raffles and participation from the police and fire departments and neighborhood organizations.
 
What the experience did tell us at the WVCA is that money is hardly the main thing a neighborhood council is all about, despite many of your articles in The Sun to the contrary.  Budget items can take up to a year or longer for reimbursement from the city, and the WVCA was prepared to pay for the entire Westside Village Festival and pay $500 for the Bike Rodeo out of its own funds if the City never came through — the vote was taken unanimously by the WVCA Board.
 
Your arguments about a Palms–Westside Village Neighborhood Council being financially better for Westside Village goes against the reasons why the WVCA chooses to stay with the MVCC — in fact, your arguments make the strongest case for Palms to remain its own neighborhood council.  Palms needs as much of city money it can get — but the WVCA does not need city money to operate.

On a final note, I was horrified to learn about individuals who were not of lower socioeconomic background getting free bikes at the Bike Rodeo.  The WVCA donated its own money in addition to that of the MVCC for individuals who could not afford their own bikes, and I donated personal funds for the Rodeo myself. 
 
To take a free bike when it's meant for those unable to purchase one is like stealing money from the blind beggar's cup. . . .
 
Westside Village is neither part of Palms nor Mar Vista; no neighborhood council is trying to conquer anyone (although The Sun appears to be trying to do just that), and you don't make good neighbors by declaring war on them.  Perhaps rather than bashing Westside Village into some contrived Palms geographical/revisionist history, a more balanced approach recognizing modern-day Westside Village as an entity independent of all adjacent regions would portray The Sun as a more friendly and accurate neighbor.

Your attacks on the MVCC and the WVCA don't make sense when you make it all about the money — not when there is a plethora of volunteers who have made it clear they are NOT about the money or even about them.  They just want to enhance the local quality of life in the best way they know how.

9. What have been your greatest achievements and your biggest disappointments in MVCC the past two years?

Alpern response:

Achievements: Establishing the MVCC as the most organized and united neighborhood council in the Westside, in contrast to the divisions that have paralyzed and brought some of the adjacent councils into virtual decertification.  The recent Playa Vista and CD11 candidate forums are the best examples of the MVCC's capabilities.
 
Disappointments:  Being unable to get more individuals to be active on committees — perhaps we overshot in our efforts and caused burnout, perhaps we could have done more to have been inclusive.  The Sun's efforts to grab the hundreds of private e-mails of our stakeholders, which forced us to delete them in order to preserve their privacy at the order of the City Attorney after years of collecting them, certainly did not help.

10. Do you think these questions are unfair? Feel free to ignore them; simply answer (or ask) some of your own.

Alpern response: All questions are fair, but some are more slanted than others.  Perhaps the main questions I'd like to ask The Sun are these:
 
• Do you really think you are advancing the otherwise worthy cause of the Palms Neighborhood Council by presenting such a threatening posture to Westside Village's leading volunteer organization? 
 
• Considering how hard it is for most folks to even get used to neighborhood councils, do you think that Westside Villagers, including the WVCA, will ever warm up in large numbers to a Palms Neighborhood Council after you declared war on this most outgoing volunteer organization in Westside Village?
 
• Have you helped or hurt the relationship of the as-of-yet unelected Palms Neighborhood Council with its neighbors in Mar Vista?